“That’s not fair, Daddy”

On Being a Second and Third-Generation Applicant to the Austrian General Settlement Fund


  • Paul Weindling


restitution in Austria, Washington Agreement of 2001, victims of the national socialism, personal experiences


Since the 1950s, the Republic of Austria insisted it had settled all the claims of its Jewish citizens regarding their properties stolen under the Nazi regime. From the late 1980s, with the help of personal recollections and case studies, it became ever clearer that this was often not the case, and that the Austrian authorities had in many instances – often deliberately – handled matters of restitution carelessly. Many losses were not addressed in Austrian restitution and compensation measures. In the course of the re-evaluation of the role of Austrian citizens in the Nazi era which took place in the 1990s, and in the wake of the Washington Agreement of 2001, a General Settlement Fund for Victims of National Socialism was established. Its purpose was to bring about a comprehensive resolution to open questions of compensation and to acknowledge Austria’s moral responsibility for losses of assets suffered by the victims of the Nazi regime in Austria between 1938 and 1945 in the form of voluntary payments. This article describes the inconsistencies and ordeals an applicant is confronted with in the course of a justified claim for restitution, based on personal experiences, but presented in a scholarly framework.




How to Cite

Weindling, Paul. 2019. “‘That’s Not Fair, Daddy’: On Being a Second and Third-Generation Applicant to the Austrian General Settlement Fund”. S: I.M.O.N. Shoah: Intervention. Methods. Documentation. 3 (2):83-102. https://simon.vwi.ac.at/index.php/simon/article/view/103.